After around 15,000 iterations, this is the driver face the computer came up with.
They say it would take a normal computer or laptop around 34 years to run the same calculations.
The result is a face which claims to offer 1.5mph extra ball speed on their existing models.
The Epic Flash and Epic Sub Zero drivers also have the Jailbreak technology we saw two years ago in the original models.
This helps to add further ball speed by allowing the face to take more load at impact thanks to two titanium bars connecting the crown and the sole.
And the use of a super-light triaxial carbon crown means enough weight has been saved to add a moveable weight on the rear of the sole of both new drivers.
Callaway are certainly talking a good game with the Epic Flash but how do these new models perform?
That’s enough about the technology – how do they perform? Find out on the next page…
[skylab_video id=”158949″]Flash vs Sub Zero[/skylab_video]
Callaway Epic Flash driver vs. Epic Flash Sub Zero: The results
I’m still recovering from an operation to remove my appendix so had to draft in colleague Craig Middleton to do the hitting on this occasion.
He play of 12, swings it a bit faster than me but is similarly inconsistent when it comes to his strike patterns.
Like me, he can miss it left and right so his results should be relevant to a large percentage of the golfing population.
As you can see from the data below both models were offering great ball speed and carry distance.

But there was a bit more consistency with the regular Epic Flash.
I believe that when you hit the Sub Zero out of the middle it will produce numbers as good as anything else on the market in 2019.
But for Craig, he was hitting far more fairways with the regular model.
And I don’t think anyone would be prepared to take three or four yards of extra distance over tighter dispersion.
Anyone who does is a fool.
Both these drivers look sensational in the address position – they have classic Callaway looks.
Even though I haven’t hit these yet, looking down on them reminded just how Callaway drivers look over the ball.
So should either of these drivers going in YOUR bag this year? Read our expert’s verdict on the next page…
Callaway Epic Flash driver vs. Epic Flash Sub Zero: NCG verdict
So are these drivers good enough to force you to part with £499? That, unfortunately, seems to be the going rate for a super-premium driver in 2019.
If you want the best products on the market, they aren’t going to come cheap.
The performance is fantastic with superb looks, sound, and feel.
The Sub Zero model does exactly what it’s supposed to do and that’s kill a bit of spin.
But it’s at the expense of a bit of forgiveness so I won’t be surprised to see lots of tour players favouring the Sub Zero.

There is no doubt in my mind that the regular Epic Flash is going to work best for the majority of club golfers.
So to what extent has this new Flash Face taken these drivers to another level?
It’s hard to gauge that at this stage as we haven’t been properly fitted yet and we haven’t put them head-to-head with other premium drivers on the market.
I’d be fairly confident that both these models will be right up there but it’s still a tall order to make significant improvements to the original Epic and Rogue models.
We’ll bring you the results of our comparison testing later in the year…
The details
SRP: £499
Lofts: 9°, 10.5°, 12° (Regular only)
Shafts: Project X EvenFlow, Project X HZRDUS Smoke, Mitsubishi Tensei AV
On sale: February 1
More information can be found on the Callaway website.
[skylab_video id=”158949″]Flash vs Sub Zero[/skylab_video]