We sometimes use affiliate links to products and services on retailer sites for which we can receive compensation if you click on those links or make purchases through them.
These irons fit into Ping’s line-up perfectly and are going to help you score out on the golf course, here’s why…
Ping’s i-Series irons have long been the go-to option for a lot of top amateur golfers, especially those who seek precision over all else. The new i240 irons continue that legacy, as they seem to slot perfectly between the elite-level Blueprint S and the more forgiving G430s and G440s.
The Ping i240s certainly offer a modern take on the players’ distance irons, but how do they stack up on performance, tech, and feel? I tested them on course and here’s what I found…
Ping i240 Iron Review – NCG Summary
NCG SUMMARY
The Ping i240 irons really are a standout entry in the players’ distance category, offering a rare blend of precision, feel, and forgiveness. With smarter weight distribution, revamped grooves, and improved launch characteristics, they make a strong case for inclusion in the bags of all mid to low-handicap golfers.
They are the perfect bridge between Ping’s tour-grade Blueprints and their more club golfer friendly G-series. These are irons built for consistent ball-strikers and produce plenty of spin and height to attack those greens and pins.
PROS
Excellent spin and height control, especially from mid to long irons
Top-tier forgiveness with minimal drop-off on off-centre hits
Ideal for consistent ball-strikers who don’t want to sacrifice feel for forgiveness
Visually, I thought the i240 were unmistakably Ping like. The top line has a confidence-inspiring appearance without looking bulky. I also found the white bottom groove aid the alignment at address. The design manages to blend sharp, clean looks in a profile that isn’t at all daunting to strike the ball from.
NCG Review
In terms of technology, a notable upgrade from the i230 is the lighter back badge. This refinement allows Ping to redistribute weight across the head for higher MOI and added forgiveness. You’ll find the familiar tungsten screw in the toe, again promoting a more centred CG and stability on off-centre hits.
Ping has also altered the groove spacing, which are wider apart than before. This results in increased spin consistency from various lies. I found this to be particularly noticeable in short irons, which produced some of the highest spin rates I have ever recorded. This enabled me to have more control when hitting into greens.
Elsewhere in terms of technology, the deeper elastomer insert in the cavity dampens vibrations and contributes to a softer feel. This is quite remarkable for a cast iron. From a performance point of view this transcends into a higher launch from longer irons and a surprising level of feel, reminded me of forged alternatives from Mizuno or Srixon.
Advertisement
This is where, for me, the i240 excels. While not the longest irons I have tested, they deliver predictability and consistency, which is crucial for more innovative shotmaking. During testing, the eight-iron carried a consistent 147 yards with exceptional spin, while the six and four irons showed impressive launch and descent angles, giving me confidence for holding the green.
Across the set, I found they had an incredibly tight front-to-back dispersion, even on mishits. That kind of consistency means I was required to hit fewer recovery shots out on the course and more scoring opportunities.
Despite being a cast head, the i240 delivers pleasing acoustics and tactile feedback. There’s a proper iron sound at contact, and it avoids the overly hot, metallic feel often associated with hollow-bodied players’ distance irons.
Final Thoughts
Overall, Ping has nailed the brief with the i240. They’re not the flashiest or longest irons out there, but they’re incredibly playable, consistent, and confidence-inspiring. If your priority is controlling distance and spin rather than chasing ball speed, give them a go.