Would you prefer a hole-in-one or an albatross?

The Scoop

They are two of the finest achievements in golf – but which would you rather have on your golfing CV? The Niggle team discuss

Dan Murphy: Speaking as someone…

Alex Perry: Here we go…

Dan Murphy: Speaking as someone who has managed a hole-in-one, an albatross, and a hole-in-one and an albatross with the same shot, I can answer this conclusively.

It’s an albatross – much rarer and therefore more special. A hole-in-one is amazing but you think you might get another one. An albatross feels like a once-in-a lifetime thing.

 

24859|c:520x330.img

Alex Perry: Speaking as someone…

Dan Murphy: Here we go…

Alex Perry: Speaking as someone who has had two holes-in-one, I’ll go for an albatross, too. As you say, not only is it more rare, it’s better for your scorecard.

You could ask a hundred golfers how many of each they’ve had, and I reckon half would say they’ve had an ace and none would say they’ve had an albatross.

I wonder if I would feel differently if I hadn’t already had a hole-in-one…

Mark Townsend: Should anyone know Royal Wimbledon then, back in ’87, I hit two Ben Hogan Apex 5-woods to the short par-5 7th. Four inches short from an albatross. They should have erected a plaque where the approach was dispatched from. Every time I have a chance of reaching a par 5 I think of that shot and then invariably tug it a bit left.

Tom Lenton: A hole-in-one for me, because I’ve haven’t had a proper one yet. A lot of people could say albatross though because they can’t actually reach the green in two…

James Savage: You say proper one like you’ve been cheated out of it. You were three off the tee so it was a par.

Christian Maiden: Easy. Hole-in-one. I’ve never been asked if I’ve ever had an albatross? And albatrosses are all flukes – you’re not aiming for the hole but the green, whereas when you shoot an ace you were actually aiming for the hole.

Alex Perry: Were you?

James Savage: I’m with Christian. When do you get asked about getting an albatross? Every time I stand on the tee box on a par 3 it goes through my head that this could be the one.

It must be like willing your football team to score from a corner in the last minute. The keeper comes up and heads it into the top corner – I know that feeling and it’s brilliant.

I’d never normally expect to reach a par 5 in two so would never be thinking about trying to get an albatross.
There’s a chance – albeit very slim – of a hole-in-one on every par 3. I want to get one so I can stop trying, and thinking about it, and so I can tell you all about it.

Craig Middleton: I think I’d prefer and albatross. A hole-in-one is always possible given it’s just one shot. An albatross you need to hit a cracking drive, and an inch perfect second. I feel I’d have more chance of making a hole-in-one than an albatross. If that makes sense.

Dan Murphy: Although I’ve now had two of them. But let’s not get into that again…

James Broadhurst: Seeing as I’ve never had either I would go for a hole-in-one. Just to get off the mark and I could do the hole bragging thing about where I got it.

However, I think an albatross would be more satisfying personally. I’ll get back to you when I have marked them both off the to do list…

Your say: So, what would you prefer to get? Let us know in the comments below, or join the conversation on Twitter and Facebook

More from The Niggle

Click here for the full Niggle archive

 

Previous article
Next article
Top